Georgia bill would shield gun makers from many lawsuits
Firearms; activities relating to such that occur at a sport shooting range; negligent acts of a third party involving the use of a weapon, firearm; limit liability of a weapons, firearms, or ammunition manufacturer, trade assoc. · Introduced as of 2025-02-20
Bad for everyday people — on our 1–10 scale, 1 hurts and 10 helps.
What it does
The bill would stop people from suing gun makers or range owners when a third‑party mishandles a firearm.
What it means for you
Ordinary Georgians could lose the chance to hold gun makers accountable if a shooting accident happens at a range, leaving victims to bear costs.
Who it's for
Firearms manufacturers
Why it scores 2/10 — the receipts
- Accountability (hurts) — Reduces ability to sue. Manufacturers and range owners shielded from third‑party negligence claims
- Rights & Protections (hurts) — Weakens consumer rights. Limits lawsuits for victims of firearm accidents
- Who Bears the Cost (hurts) — Shifts cost to victims. Victims must pay damages instead of manufacturers
- Process Transparency (hurts) — Limited public input. Bill is only introduced, no hearings noted
- Funding Tilt (neutral) — No funding changes. Bill does not allocate or redirect money
Who's behind it
Republican-sponsored (10R / 0D)