Skip to content

Use your browser's Print → Save as PDF to keep a copy. Every page links back to the live bill.

← Back to the edition
Obillerate · Watchdog

South Dakota Bill Book

2026

The South Dakota bills that matter most, scored 1–10 on who they really help — with the receipts. One bill per page. Free to read, print and share.

33 bills scored · data as of 2026-07-28

How to read this book

The score.Every bill gets a 1–10 on one question: does it help or hurt everyday people? 1 hurts, 10 helps, 5–6 is mixed. The score is our editorial judgement — so every page shows the reasoning behind it, factor by factor. That section is the “receipts”, and it is the part no other bill list gives you.

How bills were chosen. Ranked, not cherry-picked. This edition prints the 10 lowest-scoring and 10 highest-scoring of the 33 bills we have fully analysed for South Dakota. A bill only qualifies if it passed our verification step, has a recorded official status, and has its reasoning attached. Thin entries are left out rather than padded.

Lowest-scoring is not the same as evil. Only 143 bills in the entire country score 3 or below, so in most states the bottom of the list includes bills that are simply mixed. We label each one for what it is instead of inflating it.

These are proposals, not law — unless the status line says otherwise. Bills move constantly; each page shows the status we recorded on 2026-07-28 and links to the live version.

Bill data from LegiScan (CC BY 4.0), Congress.gov and OpenStates. Analysis and scoring are Obillerate's own. Editorial opinion, not legal advice — always read the official text before acting. Spot an error? www.obillerate.com/corrections

10 lowest-scoring

The worst South Dakota bills

Ranked from the lowest score up. These are the ones most likely to cost you money, rights or recourse.

SD HB1032 · Housing & Property

South Dakota bill would lift cap on property tax increases

Eliminate a limit on the accumulation of the unused index factor for property taxation. · Introduced as of 2026-01-13

2/10
Hurts you

Bad for everyday people — on our 1–10 scale, 1 hurts and 10 helps.

What it does

The bill would let property taxes keep growing without a limit, making homeowners pay more over time.

What it means for you

Citizens could see bigger tax bills on their homes, while the state gains extra revenue; now is the chance to push back before it passes.

Who it's for

Government Power

Why it scores 2/10 — the receipts

  • Accountability (neutral) no new oversight. No new accountability measures are added.
  • Rights & Protections (hurts) homeowners lose protection. Removes cap on tax growth, reducing homeowner safeguards.
  • Who Bears the Cost (hurts) homeowners pay more. Tax increases shift to property owners.
  • Process Transparency (neutral) standard process. Bill follows normal legislative steps.
  • Funding Tilt (helps) benefits state coffers. Potential higher tax receipts for the state.

Who's behind it

Republican-sponsored (6R / 0D)

How they voted

House · 2026-01-22 passed
Yes 8R/0D · No 5R/0D

Read it yourself

SD HB1032 · South Dakota Bill Book 2026 · page 1 of 20www.obillerate.com/bill/sd-hb1032-066313

Bills move. This page shows the status recorded on 2026-07-28 — check the link above for the live status. Scores are editorial opinion, not legal advice. Wrong? www.obillerate.com/corrections

SD HB1057 · Consumer Protection

South Dakota bans lab‑grown protein products

Prohibit the manufacture, sale, and distribution of any product containing cell-cultured protein, and to provide a penalty therefor. · Introduced as of 2026-01-14

2/10
Hurts you

Bad for everyday people — on our 1–10 scale, 1 hurts and 10 helps.

What it does

The bill would stop any food with lab‑grown protein from being made, sold, or shipped in South Dakota, limiting consumer choice.

What it means for you

People could lose access to new sustainable foods while big meat companies keep their market monopoly. The ban could set a precedent for other states, so now is the time to speak up before it spreads.

Who it's for

Big Business

Why it scores 2/10 — the receipts

  • Accountability (hurts) restricts accountability. removes legal pathway for producers, limiting oversight
  • Rights & Protections (hurts) removes consumer choice. bans a class of food products, limiting options for shoppers
  • Who Bears the Cost (hurts) costs fall on innovators and consumers. new producers must stop, consumers may face higher prices for alternatives
  • Process Transparency (neutral) no extra transparency. bill text is brief and does not add reporting requirements
  • Funding Tilt (neutral) no funding mentioned. the bill does not allocate money or create new fees

Who's behind it

Republican-sponsored (20R / 0D)

Read it yourself

SD HB1057 · South Dakota Bill Book 2026 · page 2 of 20www.obillerate.com/bill/sd-hb1057-072712

Bills move. This page shows the status recorded on 2026-07-28 — check the link above for the live status. Scores are editorial opinion, not legal advice. Wrong? www.obillerate.com/corrections

SD HB1171 · Privacy & Data

Bill would force blood donors to reveal COVID vaccine status

Establish provisions related to the disclosure of COVID-19 and mRNA vaccination status and blood donations. · Introduced as of 2026-01-28

3/10
Hurts you

Bad for everyday people — on our 1–10 scale, 1 hurts and 10 helps.

What it does

The bill would make people who give blood tell the center whether they have had COVID‑19 or an mRNA vaccine, affecting their privacy.

What it means for you

This could scare donors away, lower blood supplies, and let centers track health info, so citizens should watch the bill now.

Who it's for

Blood donation centers

Why it scores 3/10 — the receipts

  • Rights & Protections (hurts) reduces privacy. requires donors to share health info
  • Accountability (neutral) no change. no new oversight
  • Who Bears the Cost (hurts) privacy burden on donors. donors must disclose personal health data
  • Process Transparency (neutral) no change. bill text unclear
  • Funding Tilt (neutral) no funding changes. none

Who's behind it

Republican-sponsored (22R / 0D)

How they voted

House · 2026-02-17 failed
Yes 23R/0D · No 37R/5D

Read it yourself

SD HB1171 · South Dakota Bill Book 2026 · page 3 of 20www.obillerate.com/bill/sd-hb1171-095191

Bills move. This page shows the status recorded on 2026-07-28 — check the link above for the live status. Scores are editorial opinion, not legal advice. Wrong? www.obillerate.com/corrections

SD HB1168 · Money & Damages

Property tax credit for private school tuition proposed

Provide a property tax credit for the payment of nonpublic school tuition. · Introduced as of 2026-01-28

4/10
Mixed

Mixed: some good, some bad — on our 1–10 scale, 1 hurts and 10 helps.

What it does

This bill would let some families pay less in property taxes if they send their kids to private schools.

What it means for you

If this bill passes, it could help wealthy families save money but might shift costs to those who cannot afford private school.

Who it's for

The Wealthy / Donors

Why it scores 4/10 — the receipts

  • Who Bears the Cost (hurts) Could shift costs to public school funding.. The credit may reduce property tax revenue that supports public schools.
  • Rights & Protections (neutral) Neutral impact on rights.. The bill does not directly affect individual rights.

Who's behind it

Republican-sponsored (2R / 0D)

How they voted

House · 2026-02-23 passed
Yes 5R/1D · No 3R/0D

Read it yourself

SD HB1168 · South Dakota Bill Book 2026 · page 4 of 20www.obillerate.com/bill/sd-hb1168-095276

Bills move. This page shows the status recorded on 2026-07-28 — check the link above for the live status. Scores are editorial opinion, not legal advice. Wrong? www.obillerate.com/corrections

SD HB1191 · Money & Damages

Sales tax break for firearms could boost gun sales

Provide a sales tax holiday on firearms. · Introduced as of 2026-01-29

4/10
Mixed

Mixed: some good, some bad — on our 1–10 scale, 1 hurts and 10 helps.

What it does

This bill would let people buy guns without paying sales tax, which might make guns cheaper.

What it means for you

If this bill passes, it could help gun sellers by making firearms more affordable, but it shifts tax costs to everyone else.

Who it's for

Big Business

Why it scores 4/10 — the receipts

  • Who Bears the Cost (hurts) Shifts tax burden.. Less tax revenue means other taxpayers may pay more.
  • Process Transparency (neutral) Standard legislative process.. Introduced and referred to committee.

Who's behind it

Bipartisan sponsorship (2R / 1D)

Read it yourself

SD HB1191 · South Dakota Bill Book 2026 · page 5 of 20www.obillerate.com/bill/sd-hb1191-100427

Bills move. This page shows the status recorded on 2026-07-28 — check the link above for the live status. Scores are editorial opinion, not legal advice. Wrong? www.obillerate.com/corrections

SD HB1217 · Money & Damages

School districts barred from using tax money to back unions

Limit the use of taxpayer funds and resources by a public education employer to support a labor organization or affiliate and to provide a penalty therefor. · Introduced as of 2026-01-29

4/10
Mixed

Mixed: some good, some bad — on our 1–10 scale, 1 hurts and 10 helps.

What it does

Schools could not spend taxpayer money to support a teachers' union or its affiliate, and could be fined for doing so.

What it means for you

This bill tries to keep your tax dollars away from union politics, but it could weaken teachers' bargaining power and limit their ability to protect classroom resources.

Who it's for

Everyday People

Why it scores 4/10 — the receipts

  • Accountability (helps) adds penalties. schools could be fined for using funds to support unions
  • Rights & Protections (hurts) limits union support. prevents schools from spending money to back labor organizations
  • Who Bears the Cost (helps) shifts cost to schools. penalties fall on school districts, not taxpayers
  • Process Transparency (neutral) no new transparency. standard legislative process
  • Funding Tilt (helps) tilts funds away from unions. restricts use of tax money for union activities

Who's behind it

Republican-sponsored (9R / 0D)

How they voted

House · 2026-02-18 failed
Yes 27R/0D · No 35R/5D

Read it yourself

SD HB1217 · South Dakota Bill Book 2026 · page 6 of 20www.obillerate.com/bill/sd-hb1217-101232

Bills move. This page shows the status recorded on 2026-07-28 — check the link above for the live status. Scores are editorial opinion, not legal advice. Wrong? www.obillerate.com/corrections

SD HB1005 · Money & Damages

Data center tax break bill moves through South Dakota house

Provide a sales and use tax exemption for goods and services related to data center operations. · Introduced as of 2026-01-13

5/10
Mixed

Mixed: some good, some bad — on our 1–10 scale, 1 hurts and 10 helps.

What it does

The bill would let data center owners skip sales tax on equipment and services, saving them money but costing the state revenue.

What it means for you

Citizens should watch because the tax break could mean less money for schools and roads, while data center firms get a big discount and may attract more investment.

Who it's for

Data centers

Why it scores 5/10 — the receipts

  • Accountability (neutral) exemption reduces oversight of tax revenue. Skipping tax on data center purchases lowers the state's ability to track revenue from that sector.
  • Rights & Protections (neutral) no direct impact on personal rights. The bill does not change any individual legal protections.
  • Who Bears the Cost (hurts) cost shifts to all taxpayers. Lost tax revenue must be made up by the state, likely affecting public services.
  • Process Transparency (neutral) standard legislative process. The bill follows normal committee referral and hearing steps.
  • Funding Tilt (hurts) tilts tax benefits toward data center industry. Provides a financial advantage specifically to data center operators.

Follow the money

Pushing for it: Data center operators
Bearing the cost: Taxpayers

Who's behind it

Republican-sponsored (16R / 0D)

How they voted

House · 2026-02-04 passed
Yes 8R/1D · No 2R/1D

Read it yourself

SD HB1005 · South Dakota Bill Book 2026 · page 7 of 20www.obillerate.com/bill/sd-hb1005-061028

Bills move. This page shows the status recorded on 2026-07-28 — check the link above for the live status. Scores are editorial opinion, not legal advice. Wrong? www.obillerate.com/corrections

SD HB1179 · Money & Damages

Changes to fees for garnishment disclosures are being proposed

Modify provisions related to the reimbursement fee for preparation of a garnishment disclosure. · Engrossed as of 2026-02-06

5/10
Mixed

Mixed: some good, some bad — on our 1–10 scale, 1 hurts and 10 helps.

What it does

This bill would change how much people pay for garnishment papers, which could affect their money.

What it means for you

People should pay attention to this bill because it could change how much they have to spend when dealing with garnishments. If the fees go up, it could hurt those who are already struggling financially.

Who it's for

Why it scores 5/10 — the receipts

  • Funding Tilt (neutral) No clear funding impact.. Unknown
  • Accountability (neutral) No direct accountability changes.. Unknown

Who's behind it

Republican-sponsored (2R / 0D)

How they voted

Senate · 2026-03-03 failed
Yes 15R/1D · No 16R/2D

Read it yourself

SD HB1179 · South Dakota Bill Book 2026 · page 8 of 20www.obillerate.com/bill/sd-hb1179-099904

Bills move. This page shows the status recorded on 2026-07-28 — check the link above for the live status. Scores are editorial opinion, not legal advice. Wrong? www.obillerate.com/corrections

SD HB1301 · Consumer Protection

New bill aims to control electricity costs for data centers

Limit costs and risks associated with electricity use by data centers and impose a moratorium. · Introduced as of 2026-02-04

5/10
Mixed

Mixed: some good, some bad — on our 1–10 scale, 1 hurts and 10 helps.

What it does

This bill would limit how much energy data centers can use and costs they can pass on to others.

What it means for you

If this bill passes, it could help keep energy costs down, but it is unclear how it will affect regular people.

Who it's for

Why it scores 5/10 — the receipts

  • Accountability (neutral) The bill is unclear about who holds responsibility for costs.. No specific accountability measures are mentioned.
  • Rights & Protections (neutral) The bill does not clearly protect consumers' rights.. It focuses on costs but lacks consumer protections.
  • Who Bears the Cost (hurts) It is uncertain who will ultimately pay for the costs.. Data centers may pass costs to consumers.
  • Process Transparency (neutral) The process is ongoing but lacks clarity.. Details on the moratorium are not well explained.
  • Funding Tilt (neutral) No funding changes are mentioned.. The bill does not address funding sources.

Who's behind it

Democrat-sponsored (0R / 3D)

How they voted

House · 2026-02-18 passed
Yes 10R/0D · No 0R/2D

Read it yourself

SD HB1301 · South Dakota Bill Book 2026 · page 9 of 20www.obillerate.com/bill/sd-hb1301-107251

Bills move. This page shows the status recorded on 2026-07-28 — check the link above for the live status. Scores are editorial opinion, not legal advice. Wrong? www.obillerate.com/corrections

SD HB1124 · Criminal Justice

New bill makes trespassing in places of worship a crime

Establish the crime of trespass upon a place of worship, provide a penalty therefor, and declare an emergency. · Introduced as of 2026-01-23

5/10
Mixed

Mixed: some good, some bad — on our 1–10 scale, 1 hurts and 10 helps.

What it does

This bill would make it a crime to trespass on places of worship and set penalties for it.

What it means for you

While protecting places of worship is important, this bill may not solve bigger issues and could create confusion about what counts as trespassing.

Who it's for

Nobody / Symbolic

Why it scores 5/10 — the receipts

  • Accountability (neutral) Creates a new crime but unclear if it addresses real issues.. The bill does not clarify how it will prevent actual harm.
  • Rights & Protections (neutral) May protect places of worship but could limit public access.. The definition of trespass may restrict lawful gatherings.
  • Process Transparency (neutral) The legislative process is ongoing and public input is unclear.. More hearings and discussions are needed to clarify the bill.

Who's behind it

Republican-sponsored (14R / 0D)

How they voted

House · 2026-02-04 failed
Yes 21R/0D · No 43R/5D

Read it yourself

SD HB1124 · South Dakota Bill Book 2026 · page 10 of 20www.obillerate.com/bill/sd-hb1124-091601

Bills move. This page shows the status recorded on 2026-07-28 — check the link above for the live status. Scores are editorial opinion, not legal advice. Wrong? www.obillerate.com/corrections

10 highest-scoring

The best South Dakota bills

The other half of the record: bills that would actually help everyday people.

SD SB86 · Work & Wages

State can check if contractors have worker insurance

Authorize purchasing agency verification and monitoring of workers' compensation insurance coverage obtained by public improvement contractors. · Introduced as of 2026-01-14

9/10
Helps you

Good for everyday people — on our 1–10 scale, 1 hurts and 10 helps.

What it does

This bill would let the state check if companies building public projects have insurance for their workers, so injured workers get help.

What it means for you

This bill would help make sure that workers on state projects are safe and covered if they get hurt. If companies do not have workers' insurance, injured workers might not get paid or have their doctor bills covered. This bill would give the state power to check on this, which is good for workers and keeps everyone honest. Some might say it adds more rules for businesses, but it protects people who work hard.

Who it's for

Workers

Why it scores 9/10 — the receipts

  • Accountability (helps) Increases oversight. The bill would let state agencies verify and monitor workers' compensation insurance, making contractors more accountable.
  • Rights & Protections (helps) Protects workers. Ensuring contractors have insurance protects workers' right to get help if they are hurt on the job.
  • Who Bears the Cost (helps) Ensures proper cost bearer. This bill would make sure contractors, not injured workers or taxpayers, pay for worker injuries through insurance.
  • Process Transparency (neutral) No direct impact. The bill does not directly change how transparent the government process is.
  • Funding Tilt (neutral) No specific funding mentioned. The bill does not mention new funding or how money would be shifted.

Follow the money

Pushing for it: Workers, taxpayers (indirectly)
Bearing the cost: Contractors who might avoid insurance costs

Who's behind it

Republican-sponsored (2R / 0D)

How they voted

Senate · 2026-01-27 passed
Yes 5R/0D · No 3R/1D

Read it yourself

SD SB86 · South Dakota Bill Book 2026 · page 11 of 20www.obillerate.com/bill/sd-sb86-073990

Bills move. This page shows the status recorded on 2026-07-28 — check the link above for the live status. Scores are editorial opinion, not legal advice. Wrong? www.obillerate.com/corrections

SD HB1031 · Criminal Justice

South Dakota bill would make rape penalties tougher

Revise and repeal provisions related to rape offenses and to increase the penalty therefor. · Introduced as of 2026-01-13

9/10
Helps you

Good for everyday people — on our 1–10 scale, 1 hurts and 10 helps.

What it does

This bill would make punishments for rape more strict, which could help keep people safer from this terrible crime.

What it means for you

This bill would make changes to how rape offenses are handled in South Dakota. It would make the punishments for these crimes harsher. This is good because it could make people who commit these crimes think twice, and it shows that the state takes these crimes very seriously. Some might worry about how these changes affect the justice system, but the main goal is to protect people and make sure victims get justice. People should pay attention to this bill because it aims to make the community safer.

Who it's for

Everyday People

Why it scores 9/10 — the receipts

  • Accountability (helps) Holds offenders more accountable.. The bill aims to increase penalties for rape offenses, holding offenders more accountable for their actions.
  • Rights & Protections (helps) Protects victims.. By increasing penalties, the bill seeks to offer greater protection and justice for victims of rape.
  • Who Bears the Cost (neutral) No clear cost shift mentioned.. The bill does not specify financial costs or shifts, focusing on increasing penalties for offenders.
  • Process Transparency (neutral) Standard legislative process.. The bill is moving through the standard legislative process, with committee hearings and votes reported.
  • Funding Tilt (neutral) Not a funding bill.. The bill does not include specific funding provisions or allocations.

Follow the money

Pushing for it: Victims of crime, public safety
Bearing the cost: Offenders

Who's behind it

Republican-sponsored (10R / 2D)

How they voted

House · 2026-02-11 passed
Yes 8R/0D · No 2R/0D

Read it yourself

SD HB1031 · South Dakota Bill Book 2026 · page 12 of 20www.obillerate.com/bill/sd-hb1031-065252

Bills move. This page shows the status recorded on 2026-07-28 — check the link above for the live status. Scores are editorial opinion, not legal advice. Wrong? www.obillerate.com/corrections

SD HB1075 · Housing & Property

Property owners get a heads-up on tax changes

Require notification of property owners prior to the establishment of a tax increment financing district. · Introduced as of 2026-01-15

9/10
Helps you

Good for everyday people — on our 1–10 scale, 1 hurts and 10 helps.

What it does

This bill would make sure property owners know before a special tax district is made, so they can understand how it might affect their taxes.

What it means for you

This bill would help regular people by making sure they get a warning before a "tax increment financing district" is set up. These districts can change how your property taxes are used, often to help new building projects. Right now, you might not know about it until it's too late. This bill would give you a chance to learn and speak up about these changes before they happen. It's about giving people more say over what happens with their property and their money.

Who it's for

Everyday People

Why it scores 9/10 — the receipts

  • Accountability (helps) Increases government transparency. Requires government to inform property owners before creating a special tax district.
  • Rights & Protections (helps) Protects property owners' right to know. Ensures property owners are aware of potential changes to their property's tax situation.
  • Who Bears the Cost (neutral) No direct cost shift. The bill focuses on notification, not on who pays for the district itself.
  • Process Transparency (helps) Significantly boosts public awareness. Directly adds a notification step to the process of establishing a tax increment financing district.
  • Funding Tilt (neutral) No funding changes. The bill does not allocate or reallocate funds, only requires notification.

Follow the money

Pushing for it: Property owners (through increased awareness)
Bearing the cost: Government entities (slight administrative cost for notification)

Who's behind it

Republican-sponsored (4R / 0D)

Read it yourself

SD HB1075 · South Dakota Bill Book 2026 · page 13 of 20www.obillerate.com/bill/sd-hb1075-080506

Bills move. This page shows the status recorded on 2026-07-28 — check the link above for the live status. Scores are editorial opinion, not legal advice. Wrong? www.obillerate.com/corrections

SD HB1026 · Privacy & Data

State wants to license property data collectors

Provide for the licensing of property data collectors and the registration of property data collection companies and to provide a penalty therefor. · Introduced as of 2026-01-13

8/10
Helps you

Good for everyday people — on our 1–10 scale, 1 hurts and 10 helps.

What it does

This bill would make people who collect facts about your home get a license, which could help keep your information safer.

What it means for you

This bill would make sure that only approved people and companies can gather information about your home. This could stop bad actors from getting your private property details. It's important because it adds a layer of protection for homeowners while the bill is still moving through the legislature.

Who it's for

Property data collection companies

Why it scores 8/10 — the receipts

  • Accountability (helps) Adds rules for who can collect your property data. The bill would make sure that people and companies who collect facts about your home have to be licensed or registered, which means they would be held more accountable.
  • Rights & Protections (helps) Could protect your property information. By requiring licenses and registration, the bill would add a layer of protection for homeowners' property information against unauthorized or improper collection.
  • Who Bears the Cost (neutral) Unknown costs, likely on data collectors. The bill does not say who would pay for the licenses or registration, but it would likely be the data collectors and companies themselves.
  • Process Transparency (neutral) Standard legislative process. The bill is moving through the normal steps in the legislature, with a committee hearing and vote.
  • Funding Tilt (neutral) No specific funding mentioned. The bill does not mention any specific money for or against ordinary people.

Follow the money

Pushing for it: Homeowners (potential increased protection)
Bearing the cost: Property data collectors and companies (cost of licensing/registration)

Who's behind it

Republican-sponsored (3R / 0D)

How they voted

House · 2026-01-26 passed
Yes 10R/1D · No 2R/0D

Read it yourself

SD HB1026 · South Dakota Bill Book 2026 · page 14 of 20www.obillerate.com/bill/sd-hb1026-064815

Bills move. This page shows the status recorded on 2026-07-28 — check the link above for the live status. Scores are editorial opinion, not legal advice. Wrong? www.obillerate.com/corrections

SD HB1037 · Consumer Protection

Veterans could fish for free with new license exemption

Exempt active-duty members of the armed forces of the United States and veterans from paying a resident fishing license fee. · Introduced as of 2026-01-13

8/10
Helps you

Good for everyday people — on our 1–10 scale, 1 hurts and 10 helps.

What it does

This bill would let veterans and active-duty military fish without paying for a license, saving them money.

What it means for you

This is a good chance to honor those who serve by helping them save on fishing costs. It is important to support our veterans and active-duty members.

Who it's for

Everyday People

Why it scores 8/10 — the receipts

  • Rights & Protections (helps) Supports veterans' rights.. Exempting them from fees shows support for their service.
  • Accountability (neutral) No negative accountability issues.. The bill does not harm anyone.

Who's behind it

Republican-sponsored (14R / 1D)

How they voted

House · 2026-01-22 passed
Yes 11R/0D · No 2R/0D

Read it yourself

SD HB1037 · South Dakota Bill Book 2026 · page 15 of 20www.obillerate.com/bill/sd-hb1037-066931

Bills move. This page shows the status recorded on 2026-07-28 — check the link above for the live status. Scores are editorial opinion, not legal advice. Wrong? www.obillerate.com/corrections

SD HB1182 · Privacy & Data

State wants to track IVF clinics and punish noncompliance

Establish a data collection system pertaining to assisted reproductive technology and to provide a penalty therefor. · Introduced as of 2026-01-29

7/10
Helps you

Good for everyday people — on our 1–10 scale, 1 hurts and 10 helps.

What it does

The state would force IVF clinics to send data on treatments and could fine them if they don’t.

What it means for you

People who use fertility services could get safer care because the state can see what clinics do, but the rule may add paperwork and cost for clinics, which could raise prices.

Who it's for

Everyday People

Why it scores 7/10 — the receipts

  • Accountability (helps) positive. Penalties encourage clinics to report data.
  • Rights & Protections (hurts) negative. Collecting personal health data may infringe patient privacy.
  • Who Bears the Cost (hurts) negative. Clinics may bear compliance costs, possibly passed to patients.
  • Process Transparency (helps) positive. Data system makes clinic practices more visible to regulators.
  • Funding Tilt (neutral) neutral. Bill does not specify funding sources.

Who's behind it

Republican-sponsored (6R / 0D)

How they voted

House · 2026-02-18 failed
Yes 25R/0D · No 37R/5D

Read it yourself

SD HB1182 · South Dakota Bill Book 2026 · page 16 of 20www.obillerate.com/bill/sd-hb1182-100223

Bills move. This page shows the status recorded on 2026-07-28 — check the link above for the live status. Scores are editorial opinion, not legal advice. Wrong? www.obillerate.com/corrections

SD SB186 · Consumer Protection

New bill allows direct shipment of spirits to consumers

Authorize the shipment of distilled spirits directly to consumers, and to provide a penalty therefor. · Introduced as of 2026-01-29

7/10
Helps you

Good for everyday people — on our 1–10 scale, 1 hurts and 10 helps.

What it does

This bill would let people buy distilled spirits shipped directly to their homes, making it easier to get their favorite drinks.

What it means for you

If this bill passes, people could enjoy more choices for buying spirits. It's a good time to support it so everyone can benefit.

Who it's for

Everyday People

Why it scores 7/10 — the receipts

  • Accountability (neutral) No significant accountability measures included.. The bill does not address accountability for shipping companies.
  • Rights & Protections (helps) Enhances consumer rights to purchase spirits.. Consumers gain the right to order spirits directly.
  • Who Bears the Cost (neutral) Costs are not shifted to consumers.. No new fees or taxes mentioned in the bill.
  • Process Transparency (neutral) No transparency measures included.. The process for penalties is not clearly defined.
  • Funding Tilt (neutral) No funding implications noted.. The bill does not mention funding sources.

Who's behind it

Republican-sponsored (2R / 0D)

How they voted

Senate · 2026-02-12 passed
Yes 6R/0D · No 1R/1D

Read it yourself

SD SB186 · South Dakota Bill Book 2026 · page 17 of 20www.obillerate.com/bill/sd-sb186-101114

Bills move. This page shows the status recorded on 2026-07-28 — check the link above for the live status. Scores are editorial opinion, not legal advice. Wrong? www.obillerate.com/corrections

SD HB1261 · Housing & Property

Tax credit for homeowners moves money to state fund

Provide a tax credit for owner-occupied property, to make an appropriation therefor, and to transfer moneys to the general fund. · Introduced as of 2026-02-03

7/10
Helps you

Good for everyday people — on our 1–10 scale, 1 hurts and 10 helps.

What it does

The bill would let people who own and live in their homes pay less property tax, while shifting the cost to the state's general fund.

What it means for you

Homeowners could see a tax break, but the credit costs the state and other taxpayers, so voters should watch the bill as it moves through the House.

Who it's for

Everyday People

Why it scores 7/10 — the receipts

  • Accountability (neutral) no change. no new oversight
  • Rights & Protections (helps) helps homeowners. reduces tax burden
  • Who Bears the Cost (hurts) cost shift to all taxpayers. state loses revenue
  • Process Transparency (neutral) standard process. no special hearings
  • Funding Tilt (neutral) appropriates funds. moves money to general fund

Who's behind it

Republican-sponsored (9R / 0D)

How they voted

J · 2026-02-25 passed
Yes 11R/0D · No 4R/2D

Read it yourself

SD HB1261 · South Dakota Bill Book 2026 · page 18 of 20www.obillerate.com/bill/sd-hb1261-105027

Bills move. This page shows the status recorded on 2026-07-28 — check the link above for the live status. Scores are editorial opinion, not legal advice. Wrong? www.obillerate.com/corrections

SD HB1139 · Money & Damages

Funding for schools and state services is on the table

Appropriate money for the ordinary expenses of the legislative, judicial, and executive departments of the state, the current expenses of state institutions, interest on the public debt, and common schools. · Introduced as of 2026-01-26

7/10
Helps you

Good for everyday people — on our 1–10 scale, 1 hurts and 10 helps.

What it does

This bill would provide money for schools and state services, which helps everyone in the community.

What it means for you

If this bill passes, it could mean better schools and services for people. Now is the time to support it.

Who it's for

Everyday People

Why it scores 7/10 — the receipts

  • Funding Tilt (helps) Supports funding for essential services.. This bill appropriates money for important state functions.

Follow the money

Pushing for it: state departments and common schools
Bearing the cost: Unknown

Who's behind it

Sponsorship unclear

Read it yourself

SD HB1139 · South Dakota Bill Book 2026 · page 19 of 20www.obillerate.com/bill/sd-hb1139-093527

Bills move. This page shows the status recorded on 2026-07-28 — check the link above for the live status. Scores are editorial opinion, not legal advice. Wrong? www.obillerate.com/corrections

SD SB235 · Consumer Protection

New bill aims to protect residents from rising utility costs

Protect residents from increased utility costs and utility shortages caused by data centers, to clarify authority to regulate data centers, and to modify provisions pertaining to the purchasing of goods and services by a data center. · Introduced as of 2026-02-04

7/10
Helps you

Good for everyday people — on our 1–10 scale, 1 hurts and 10 helps.

What it does

This bill would help stop data centers from raising utility prices for regular people.

What it means for you

If this bill passes, it could keep utility costs lower for everyone. It's important to speak up now to protect your wallet.

Who it's for

Everyday People

Why it scores 7/10 — the receipts

  • Accountability (helps) The bill increases regulation on data centers.. It clarifies authority to regulate data centers.
  • Rights & Protections (helps) Protects residents from rising costs.. It aims to prevent data centers from raising utility prices.
  • Who Bears the Cost (helps) Shifts costs back to data centers.. It aims to stop data centers from passing costs to residents.

Who's behind it

Republican-sponsored (1R / 0D)

How they voted

Senate · 2026-02-18 passed
Yes 5R/0D · No 3R/1D

Read it yourself

SD SB235 · South Dakota Bill Book 2026 · page 20 of 20www.obillerate.com/bill/sd-sb235-107807

Bills move. This page shows the status recorded on 2026-07-28 — check the link above for the live status. Scores are editorial opinion, not legal advice. Wrong? www.obillerate.com/corrections

Index by bill number

  • HB1005 5/10 · Data center tax break bill moves through South Dakota house
  • HB1026 8/10 · State wants to license property data collectors
  • HB1031 9/10 · South Dakota bill would make rape penalties tougher
  • HB1032 2/10 · South Dakota bill would lift cap on property tax increases
  • HB1037 8/10 · Veterans could fish for free with new license exemption
  • HB1057 2/10 · South Dakota bans lab‑grown protein products
  • HB1075 9/10 · Property owners get a heads-up on tax changes
  • HB1124 5/10 · New bill makes trespassing in places of worship a crime
  • HB1139 7/10 · Funding for schools and state services is on the table
  • HB1168 4/10 · Property tax credit for private school tuition proposed
  • HB1171 3/10 · Bill would force blood donors to reveal COVID vaccine status
  • HB1179 5/10 · Changes to fees for garnishment disclosures are being proposed
  • HB1182 7/10 · State wants to track IVF clinics and punish noncompliance
  • HB1191 4/10 · Sales tax break for firearms could boost gun sales
  • HB1217 4/10 · School districts barred from using tax money to back unions
  • HB1261 7/10 · Tax credit for homeowners moves money to state fund
  • HB1301 5/10 · New bill aims to control electricity costs for data centers
  • SB186 7/10 · New bill allows direct shipment of spirits to consumers
  • SB235 7/10 · New bill aims to protect residents from rising utility costs
  • SB86 9/10 · State can check if contractors have worker insurance

South Dakota Bill Book 2026 · data as of 2026-07-28 · www.obillerate.com/library/2026/sd