Shields bosses from lawsuits over bad job references
Immunizes employers from civil liability for certain disclosures regarding employees and former employees. · Introduced as of 2026-02-19
Bad for everyday people — on our 1–10 scale, 1 hurts and 10 helps.
What it does
This bill would protect your old boss from being sued if they share your private work history and accident records with a new job you are trying to get.
What it means for you
This bill would make it nearly impossible to sue a former employer for ruining your chances at a new job. Right now, if a boss shares unfair details about your work history or injuries, you can take them to court. This proposal would give private companies a massive legal shield. To win a lawsuit, you would have to prove your old boss acted with actual malice, and you would need clear and convincing evidence to do it. That is a huge hurdle for a regular worker. It gives companies a free pass to share your attendance and accident records without fear of paying for the damage they cause to your career.
Who it's for
Big Business
Why it scores 2/10 — the receipts
- Accountability (hurts) — Grants employers broad legal immunity from lawsuits over job references.. The bill explicitly immunizes employers from civil liability for sharing personnel file information in good faith.
- Rights & Protections (hurts) — Raises the burden of proof to an extreme level.. Workers must show clear and convincing evidence of actual malice to overcome the immunity shield.
- Who Bears the Cost (hurts) — Workers bear the cost of lost job opportunities.. If an employer shares damaging information, the worker loses the job prospect but has no realistic way to sue for damages.
Follow the money
Pushing for it: Private employers
Bearing the cost: Workers
Who's behind it
Republican-sponsored (1R / 0D)