Scored 2/10 on whether it helps or hurts everyday people.
The Rideshare Immunity Bill
Rideshare 'immunity' bills are popping up in statehouse after statehouse
Bad for everyday people ·
Near-identical bills shielding rideshare networks from lawsuits are surfacing across states at once, a classic model-bill pattern.
Our take
What we think, in plain words.
When the same one-sentence bill shows up in capitol after capitol in one season, that's not a coincidence, it's a campaign. Whose?
Take action
Add your name. At 100 signatures we compile this petition and deliver it to the office — and every signer gets a message to send their own representatives.
0 of 100 in‑district signatures
Step 1 · Pick your position
Step 2 · Add your name
Sign in to oppose this billPicking a side above doesn't sign anything yet — a free account records your name on the petition and keeps it one signature per person. We'll bring you straight back here with your choice saved.
The facts
What the bill actually says, no spin.
- South Dakota SB 166 would bar product-liability suits against rideshare 'digital networks.'
- Indiana HB 1417 would prohibit suing rideshare companies for damages from a ride.
- Florida statute §627.748 has been read to give broad immunity already.
How they voted
The actual floor vote, and who broke from their own party.
Want to see how your representatives voted on this? Find your reps →
- Rep. J. Calder (R): broke with his party to vote NO
In the news
Scanning the news for this bill…
Headlines gathered from across the news, starting points to explore, not endorsements. Always read the official text before acting.
Sources
Read it yourself: the official bill and records.